Tag: technology policy
-
A bipartisan proposal would require powerful AI systems to have emergency controls. The challenge is making those controls effective, safe and enforceable—not just available on paper.
-
The AI policy debate is not just about partisan gridlock. Disputes over competitiveness, overlapping committee responsibilities and the role of states make a federal agreement harder to reach.
-
Promises to “pace” advanced AI mean little without clear limits. The real test is whether safety oversight can stop a dangerous project—not simply monitor it.
-
The dispute over urgent AI regulation is not simply a choice between innovation and safety. It is about who sets the rules, who verifies compliance and whether oversight can keep pace with increasingly capable systems.
-
The debate over AI safety is also a debate over power: who sets the limits, who checks compliance, and whether competition with China leaves room for independent oversight.
-
Calls to slow advanced AI development raise a practical question: who sets the limits, and how are they enforced? The answer matters more than public statements of support from technology leaders.
-
Reports of anxiety among AI workers raise a serious question: can companies competing to move fastest also agree to slow down? The answer requires more than taking either their fears or their promises at face value.
-
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei argues that the AI industry needs coordinated safeguards, independent oversight and a deliberate pace as models become more capable.